- android.gs
- Compare
- 13 Pro vs Armor 27T
Realme 13 Pro vs UleFone Armor 27T
What 13 Pro does better (15) and where Armor 27T wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
13 ProArmor 27T
| 13 Pro | Armor 27T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 182.8 mm | −21.5 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 86.8 mm | −12.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 18.5 mm | −10.3 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 441 g | −258 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 13 Pro better than Armor 27T?
- Weight184 g vs 441 g2.4×
- OLED panelYes · Armor 27T: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 27T: No
- 5GYes · Armor 27T: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor 27T: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 18.5 mm2.3×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 27T: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is Armor 27T better than 13 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 10,600 mAh2×
- Wireless chargingNo · 13 Pro: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · 13 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 13 Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 441 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 18.5 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 182.8 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 86.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Monet Gold, Emerald Green, Monet Purple | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.6% | 68.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 848,531 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,799 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 10,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 5.0 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 112 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
