- android.gs
- Compare
- WP66 vs Camon Slim 4G
Oukitel WP66 vs Tecno Camon Slim 4G
What WP66 does better (8) and where Camon Slim 4G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Display9.7
6.6Camera5.9
8.7Battery8.2
7.6Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
WP66Camon Slim 4G
| WP66 | Camon Slim 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.2 mm | 162.8 mm | +9.4 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 77.7 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm | 6.4 mm | +9.4 mm |
| Weight | 359 g | 168 g | +191 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WP66 better than Camon Slim 4G?
- Battery capacity11,000 mAh vs 5,600 mAh+96%
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- 5GYes · Camon Slim 4G: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Dual SIMYes · Camon Slim 4G: No
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon Slim 4G better than WP66?
- Wired charging33 W vs 60 W+82%
- Weight359 g vs 168 g2.1×
- OLED panelNo · WP66: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · WP66: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Thickness15.8 mm vs 6.4 mm2.5×
- Pixel density400 ppi vs 440 ppi+10%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio75.2% vs 87.7%+17%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 359 g | 168 g |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm | 6.4 mm |
| Height | 172.2 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 77.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange | New Mondrian, Prism Black, Jungle Green, Van Gogh Blue, Burgundy Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75.2% | 87.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 576,430 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,838 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.8" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 60 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16.2 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 107 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
