- android.gs
- Compare
- WP61 vs Redmi Note 15
Oukitel WP61 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15
What WP61 does better (7) and where Redmi Note 15 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display8.5
6.6Camera8.6
9.1Battery7.6
7.6Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
WP61Redmi Note 15
| WP61 | Redmi Note 15 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 179.5 mm | 164 mm | +15.5 mm |
| Width | 85 mm | 75.4 mm | +9.6 mm |
| Thickness | 27.5 mm | 7.4 mm | +20.1 mm |
| Weight | 620 g | 178 g | +442 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WP61 better than Redmi Note 15?
- Battery capacity20,000 mAh vs 5,520 mAh3.6×
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Endurance per cycle218 h vs 51 h4.2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
- Energy classA vs B
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Why is Redmi Note 15 better than WP61?
- Weight620 g vs 178 g3.5×
- Peak brightness650 nits vs 3,200 nits4.9×
- OLED panelNo · WP61: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · WP61: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · WP61: Yes
- Thickness27.5 mm vs 7.4 mm3.7×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · WP61: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio72% vs 89.7%+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 620 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 27.5 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 179.5 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 85 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Colours | Black | Black, Glacier Blue, Mist Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 650 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,524 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 72% | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 637,266 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,958 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 861 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.8" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 20,000 mAh | 5,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.2 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 218 h | 51 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 157.38.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 157.78.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A37vsXiaomi Redmi Note 158.68.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 4G8.68.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Pova Curve 28.68.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 Pro 4G8.68.6

