- android.gs
- Compare
- WP58 vs Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
Oukitel WP58 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
What WP58 does better (7) and where Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display8.4
5.4Camera8.3
8.6Battery6.5
7.6Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
WP58Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
| WP58 | Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 175.7 mm | 162.2 mm | +13.5 mm |
| Width | 82.4 mm | 74.9 mm | +7.5 mm |
| Thickness | 17.2 mm | 8.2 mm | +9 mm |
| Weight | 370 g | 180 g | +190 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WP58 better than Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G?
- Battery capacity10,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+82%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- 5GYes · Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G: No
- Endurance per cycle117 h vs 53 h2.2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Energy classA vs B
- Drop resistance classA vs B
Why is Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G better than WP58?
- Main camera64 MP vs 200 MP3.1×
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 1,800 nits3.8×
- Weight370 g vs 180 g2.1×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · WP58: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · WP58: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · WP58: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Pixel density262 ppi vs 395 ppi+51%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Thickness17.2 mm vs 8.2 mm2.1×
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 370 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 17.2 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 175.7 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Width | 82.4 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Inx glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Black, Green, Orange | Midnight Black, Aurora Purple, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.9% | 88.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Spreadtrum UMS9621S | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultra |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 423,868 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,999 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 347 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 42% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 117 h | 53 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | B |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G8.07.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4GvsRealme C857.57.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra7.57.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G7.57.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4GvsTecno Pova 7 4G7.57.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4GvsRealme C85 Pro7.57.6

