How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. WP52 vs Galaxy S24+

Oukitel WP52 vs Samsung Galaxy S24+

What WP52 does better (1) and where Galaxy S24+ wins (27) — every spec side by side.

Oukitel WP52
Oukitel · 2024WP52
6.3Score
1 advantage≈ $390
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung · 2024Galaxy S24+
9.0Score
27 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
2.6Display8.7
3.9Camera9.2
7.4Battery5.0
7.6Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

WP52Galaxy S24+
80 × 172.21275.9 × 158.57.7
WP52Galaxy S24+Difference
Height172.2 mm158.5 mm+13.7 mm
Width80 mm75.9 mm+4.1 mm
Thickness12 mm7.7 mm+4.3 mm
Weight281 g196 g+85 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is WP52 better than Galaxy S24+?

  1. Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+33%

Why is Galaxy S24+ better than WP52?

  1. RAM4 GB vs 12 GB3×
  2. Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
  3. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  4. Peak brightness440 nits vs 2,600 nits5.9×
  5. OLED panelNo · WP52: Yes
  6. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  7. Optical stabilisationNo · WP52: Yes
  8. Telephoto cameraNo · WP52: Yes
  9. Wireless chargingNo · WP52: Yes
  10. Stereo speakersNo · WP52: Yes
  11. Pixel density267 ppi vs 513 ppi+92%
  12. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.39 GHz+54%
Specifications

Side by side

Oukitel WP52Oukitel WP52≈ $3906.3
Design
Weight281 g196 g
Thickness12 mm7.7 mm
Height172.2 mm158.5 mm
Width80 mm75.9 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursBlack/BlueOnyx Black, Marble Grey, Cobalt Violet, Amber Yellow, Jade Green, Sandstone Orange, Sapphire Blue
Display
Screen size6.6″6.7″
PanelIPS LCDDynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelNoYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)720 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)1,612 px3,120 px
Pixel density267 ppi513 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness440 nits2,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,452 nits
Screen-to-body ratio76%91.6%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6100+Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 - USA/Canada/China
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz3.39 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 750 - USA/Canada/China Xclipse 940 - International
AnTuTu score—1,290,977
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—5,987
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,365
Memory
RAM4 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.56"
Rear cameras13
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video1080p8K
4K video frame rate—60 fps
Selfie camera8 MP12 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh4,900 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Ion
Active use (test)—12.5 h
Wired charging18 W45 W
Charged in 30 min—65%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—15 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display, ultrasonic
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.74 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 9
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle65 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare