- android.gs
- Compare
- WP39 vs Y200 Pro
Oukitel WP39 vs Vivo Y200 Pro
What WP39 does better (8) and where Y200 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
WP39Y200 Pro
| WP39 | Y200 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.2 mm | 164.4 mm | +7.8 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 74.9 mm | +6.1 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 7.5 mm | +7.5 mm |
| Weight | 360 g | 172 g | +188 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WP39 better than Y200 Pro?
- Battery capacity11,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- NFCYes · Y200 Pro: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Pixel density400 ppi vs 388 ppi+3%
Why is Y200 Pro better than WP39?
- Wired charging18 W vs 44 W2.4×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,300 nits2.9×
- Weight360 g vs 172 g2.1×
- OLED panelNo · WP39: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · WP39: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Thickness15 mm vs 7.5 mm2×
- Dual SIMNo · WP39: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio75.2% vs 90.1%+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 360 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 172.2 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Gray, Green | Silk black, Silk green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75.2% | 90.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 561,575 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,201 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 14 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 109 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
