android.gs
Compare
WP210 vs Camon 40 Pro

Oukitel WP210 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro

What WP210 does better (7) and where Camon 40 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Oukitel · 2025WP210

8.5Score

7 advantages

Tecno · 2025Camon 40 Pro

8.6Score

12 advantages

Higher score

7.3Display8.5

7.0Camera9.1

9.0Battery7.3

8.2Features7.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

WP210Camon 40 Pro

	WP210	Camon 40 Pro	Difference
Height	163.6 mm	164.3 mm	−0.7 mm
Width	77.9 mm	74.6 mm	+3.3 mm
Thickness	13.7 mm	7.3 mm	+6.4 mm
Weight	311 g	179 g	+132 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is WP210 better than Camon 40 Pro?

Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+69%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+24%
Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%

Why is Camon 40 Pro better than WP210?

Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,100 nits2.2×
Optical stabilisationNo · WP210: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · WP210: Yes
Weight311 g vs 179 g+74%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · WP210: Yes
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
4K selfie videoNo · WP210: Yes
Thickness13.7 mm vs 7.3 mm+88%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 89.7%+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Oukitel WP2108.5	Tecno Camon 40 Pro8.6
Design
Weight	311 g	179 g
Thickness	13.7 mm	7.3 mm
Height	163.6 mm	164.3 mm
Width	77.9 mm	74.6 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Gray, Black, Red	Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,408 px	2,436 px
Pixel density	394 ppi	393 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	500 nits	1,100 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,045 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.9%	89.7%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8200	Mediatek Dimensity 7300
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.1 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	Mali-G610 MC6	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	700,909
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	3,218
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	873
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	108 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.8"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	8,800 mAh	5,200 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.8 h
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-28.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised	—	3
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	86 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—