- android.gs
- Compare
- WP200 Pro vs iQOO Z10R (India)
Oukitel WP200 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z10R (India)
What WP200 Pro does better (9) and where iQOO Z10R (India) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display8.2
7.0Camera7.8
9.0Battery8.0
8.2Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
WP200 ProiQOO Z10R (India)
| WP200 Pro | iQOO Z10R (India) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 163.3 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 76.7 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 7.4 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Weight | 311 g | 184 g | +127 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is WP200 Pro better than iQOO Z10R (India)?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- RAM24 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+54%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- NFCYes · iQOO Z10R (India): No
- Storage (base)1,024 GB vs 128 GB8×
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Z10R (India): No
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+19%
Why is iQOO Z10R (India) better than WP200 Pro?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,800 nits3.6×
- Optical stabilisationNo · WP200 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · WP200 Pro: Yes
- Weight311 g vs 184 g+69%
- 4K selfie videoNo · WP200 Pro: Yes
- Thickness13.7 mm vs 7.4 mm+85%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.8% vs 89%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 311 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Black | Aquamarine, Moonstone |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8% | 89% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 911,502 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 1,024 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.8" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 86 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
