android.gs
Compare
Tiger 12 vs Galaxy S23 FE

OSCAL Tiger 12 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

What Tiger 12 does better (9) and where Galaxy S23 FE wins (17) — every spec side by side.

OSCAL · 2023Tiger 12

6.9Score

9 advantages≈ $210

Samsung · 2023Galaxy S23 FE

8.3Score

17 advantages≈ $220

Higher score

6.3Display7.7

5.7Camera9.2

6.0Battery3.0

6.4Features9.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Tiger 12Galaxy S23 FE

	Tiger 12	Galaxy S23 FE	Difference
Height	168.5 mm	158 mm	+10.5 mm
Width	76.6 mm	76.5 mm	+0.1 mm
Thickness	8.4 mm	8.2 mm	+0.2 mm
Weight	198 g	209 g	−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Tiger 12 better than Galaxy S23 FE?

RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S23 FE: No
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy S23 FE: No
Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
Weight198 g vs 209 g+5%
Selfie camera13 MP vs 10 MP+30%

Why is Galaxy S23 FE better than Tiger 12?

Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,450 nits2.9×
OLED panelNo · Tiger 12: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · Tiger 12: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · Tiger 12: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Tiger 12: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Tiger 12: Yes
Rear cameras1 vs 33×
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+36%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Tiger 12: Yes
Max video1080p vs 8K
4K selfie videoNo · Tiger 12: Yes
eSIMNo · Tiger 12: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OSCAL Tiger 12≈ $2106.9	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE≈ $2208.3
Design
Weight	198 g	209 g
Thickness	8.4 mm	8.2 mm
Height	168.5 mm	158 mm
Width	76.6 mm	76.5 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Cerulean Blue, Flowing Purple, Cloudwing Grey	Mint, Cream, Graphite, Purple, Indigo, Tangerine
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.4″
Panel	IPS LCD	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,460 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	396 ppi	403 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	500 nits	1,450 nits
Measured brightness	—	985 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.6%	83.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G99	Exynos 2200 - International
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Xclipse 920 - International Adreno 730 - USA
AnTuTu score	—	940,921
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	3,550
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.97"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	1	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	1080p	8K
4K video frame rate	—	60 fps
Selfie camera	13 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	4,500 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	8.5 h
Wired charging	33 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	50%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-23.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Rear	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.76 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 8
Major OS updates promised	—	4
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	800	—
Endurance per cycle	48 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	C	—