- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno9 vs iQOO 9T
OPPO Reno9 vs Vivo iQOO 9T
What Reno9 does better (8) and where iQOO 9T wins (12) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno9iQOO 9T
| Reno9 | iQOO 9T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 165 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 77 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 8 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 174 g | 206 g | −32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno9 better than iQOO 9T?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight174 g vs 206 g+18%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 8 mm+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.7% vs 87.4%+3%
Why is iQOO 9T better than Reno9?
- Wired charging67 W vs 120 W+79%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno9: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Reno9: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno9: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+4%
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,500 nits+58%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+33%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Reno9: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Charged in 30 min99% vs 188%+90%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 174 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 165 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Pink gradient, Red | Alpha, Legend (BMW M branding) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,033 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 87.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,045,901 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,059 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 99% | 188% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13 | Funtouch 14 |
