- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno9 Pro+ vs nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
OPPO Reno9 Pro+ vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
What Reno9 Pro+ does better (7) and where nubia RedMagic 8 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display8.5
8.9Camera7.8
6.4Battery8.9
8.7Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno9 Pro+nubia RedMagic 8 Pro
| Reno9 Pro+ | nubia RedMagic 8 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 164 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 76.4 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 228 g | −36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno9 Pro+ better than nubia RedMagic 8 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 8 Pro: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight192 g vs 228 g+19%
- Charged in 30 min135% vs 86%+57%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.9 mm+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is nubia RedMagic 8 Pro better than Reno9 Pro+?
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+28%
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,300 nits+37%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno9 Pro+: Yes
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,116 px+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 228 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Mint | Black, Transparent |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,116 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 821 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 89.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,288,866 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,211 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | 86% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 (China) |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13 | Redmagic OS 6 |
