- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno9 Pro+ vs nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
OPPO Reno9 Pro+ vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
What Reno9 Pro+ does better (6) and where nubia RedMagic 7S Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.4
8.9Camera8.0
6.4Battery7.8
8.7Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno9 Pro+nubia RedMagic 7S Pro
| Reno9 Pro+ | nubia RedMagic 7S Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 166.3 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 77.1 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 10 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 235 g | −43 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno9 Pro+ better than nubia RedMagic 7S Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 7S Pro: No
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 600 nits+58%
- Weight192 g vs 235 g+22%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Thickness8 mm vs 10 mm+25%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 87.1%+4%
Why is nubia RedMagic 7S Pro better than Reno9 Pro+?
- Wired charging80 W vs 135 W+69%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+6%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- RAM16 GB vs 18 GB+12%
- Charged in 30 min135% vs 300%2.2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno9 Pro+: Yes
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+6%
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 235 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 10 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 166.3 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Mint | Obsidian, Supernova, Mercury, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 449 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 87.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,601,869 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,371 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 18 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 135 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | 300% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13 | Redmagic 5.5 |
