- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno9 Pro+ vs Black Shark 5 Pro
OPPO Reno9 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
What Reno9 Pro+ does better (6) and where Black Shark 5 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display8.7
8.9Camera9.1
6.4Battery6.8
8.7Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno9 Pro+Black Shark 5 Pro
| Reno9 Pro+ | Black Shark 5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 163.9 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 76.5 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.5 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 220 g | −28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno9 Pro+ better than Black Shark 5 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Black Shark 5 Pro: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight192 g vs 220 g+15%
- Thickness8 mm vs 9.5 mm+19%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 85.7%+6%
Why is Black Shark 5 Pro better than Reno9 Pro+?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
- Telephoto cameraNo · Reno9 Pro+: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Charged in 30 min135% vs 200%+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | — |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Mint | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 682 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 85.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 876,704 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,665 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,650 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | 200% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (China only) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13 | — |
