- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno9 Pro+ vs X60 Pro+
OPPO Reno9 Pro+ vs Vivo X60 Pro+
What Reno9 Pro+ does better (10) and where X60 Pro+ wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.8
8.9Camera9.7
6.4Battery4.3
8.7Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno9 Pro+X60 Pro+
| Reno9 Pro+ | X60 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 158.6 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 73.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.1 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 191 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno9 Pro+ better than X60 Pro+?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · X60 Pro+: No
- Wired charging80 W vs 55 W+45%
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+12%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+6%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
- Thickness8 mm vs 9.1 mm+14%
Why is X60 Pro+ better than Reno9 Pro+?
- Telephoto cameraNo · Reno9 Pro+: Yes
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,300 nits+37%
- Rear cameras2 vs 42×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 191 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 158.6 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | — |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Mint | Orange, Emperor Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 816 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 734,811 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,749 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 13 | Funtouch 12 (International) |
