- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs Redmi K40 Pro+
OPPO Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
What Reno5 Pro+ 5G does better (8) and where Redmi K40 Pro+ wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.9
8.8Camera8.3
5.2Battery4.2
8.7Features7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno5 Pro+ 5GRedmi K40 Pro+
| Reno5 Pro+ 5G | Redmi K40 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 163.7 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 76.4 mm | −3.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 196 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno5 Pro+ 5G better than Redmi K40 Pro+?
- Wired charging65 W vs 33 W+97%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi K40 Pro+: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi K40 Pro+: No
- Weight184 g vs 196 g+7%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Charged in 30 min86% vs 58%+48%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 85.9%+4%
Why is Redmi K40 Pro+ better than Reno5 Pro+ 5G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 1,300 nits+18%
- Process7 nm vs 5 nm+40%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.8 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black | Black, White, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 85.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 86% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 11.1 | MIUI 12 |
