- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs Armor 11 5G
OPPO Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs UleFone Armor 11 5G
What Reno5 Pro+ 5G does better (19) and where Armor 11 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display3.0
8.8Camera6.5
5.2Battery6.6
8.7Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno5 Pro+ 5GArmor 11 5G
| Reno5 Pro+ 5G | Armor 11 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 163.8 mm | −3.9 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 81.6 mm | −9.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 14.2 mm | −6.2 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 295 g | −111 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno5 Pro+ 5G better than Armor 11 5G?
- Wired charging65 W vs 18 W3.6×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · Armor 11 5G: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 11 5G: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Armor 11 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor 11 5G: No
- Weight184 g vs 295 g+60%
- Pixel density402 ppi vs 282 ppi+43%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2 GHz+42%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
Why is Armor 11 5G better than Reno5 Pro+ 5G?
- Wireless chargingNo · Reno5 Pro+ 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+16%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno5 Pro+ 5G: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 295 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 14.2 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 81.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Oleophobic coating |
| Colours | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,560 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 282 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 68.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 800 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 86% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 10 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 11.1 | — |
