- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs Phantom X
OPPO Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs Tecno Phantom X
What Reno5 Pro+ 5G does better (15) and where Phantom X wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.3
8.8Camera7.9
5.2Battery4.3
8.7Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno5 Pro+ 5GPhantom X
| Reno5 Pro+ 5G | Phantom X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 163.5 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 73.8 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.7 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 201 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno5 Pro+ 5G better than Phantom X?
- Wired charging65 W vs 33 W+97%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Phantom X: No
- 5GYes · Phantom X: No
- NFCYes · Phantom X: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Phantom X: No
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+39%
- Weight184 g vs 201 g+9%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Pixel density402 ppi vs 385 ppi+4%
- Charged in 30 min86% vs 70%+23%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Phantom X better than Reno5 Pro+ 5G?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Reno5 Pro+ 5G: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno5 Pro+ 5G: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 48 MP+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 91.3%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 73.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black | Starry Night Blue, Monet Summer |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 405 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 91.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 309,055 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,670 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 48 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 86% | 70% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 11.1 | HiOS 7.6 |
