- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno5 F vs Galaxy A52s 5G
OPPO Reno5 F vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
What Reno5 F does better (4) and where Galaxy A52s 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display7.4
6.8Camera8.7
3.2Battery3.2
3.5Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno5 FGalaxy A52s 5G
| Reno5 F | Galaxy A52s 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 159.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 75.1 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 189 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno5 F better than Galaxy A52s 5G?
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Weight172 g vs 189 g+10%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.4 mm+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A52s 5G better than Reno5 F?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno5 F: Yes
- 5GNo · Reno5 F: Yes
- NFCNo · Reno5 F: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno5 F: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Battery capacity4,310 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+4%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Reno5 F: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Fluid Black, Fantastic Purple | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 84.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 429,675 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 11,060 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 685 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,310 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.88 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 11.1 | One UI 6 |
