- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno4 Pro vs X50 Pro
OPPO Reno4 Pro vs Vivo X50 Pro
What Reno4 Pro does better (7) and where X50 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno4 ProX50 Pro
| Reno4 Pro | X50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.2 mm | 158.5 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 72.8 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 161 g | 182 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno4 Pro better than X50 Pro?
- Wired charging65 W vs 33 W+97%
- Measured brightness843 nits vs 503 nits+68%
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 57%2.1×
- Memory card slotYes · X50 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X50 Pro: No
- Weight161 g vs 182 g+13%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8 mm+4%
Why is X50 Pro better than Reno4 Pro?
- AnTuTu score261,359 vs 323,736+24%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Reno4 Pro: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Reno4 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,315 mAh+8%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,781 vs 1,937+9%
- Rear cameras2 vs 42×
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Process8 nm vs 7 nm+14%
- Loudspeaker loudness-28.8 LUFS vs -26.8 LUFS+-7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.6+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.3% vs 90.6%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 161 g | 182 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 160.2 mm | 158.5 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Starry Night, Silky White | Dark Blue, Light Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 843 nits | 503 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.3% | 90.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 261,359 | 323,736 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,781 | 1,937 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,315 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 57% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.8 LUFS | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.34 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7.2 | Funtouch 10.5 |
