android.gs
Compare
Reno16 vs 17 Ultra

OPPO Reno16 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

What Reno16 does better (5) and where 17 Ultra wins (21) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2026Reno16

9.4Score

5 advantages≈ $1,050

Xiaomi · 202617 Ultra

9.7Score

21 advantages≈ $1,250

Higher score

8.4Display9.1

7.6Performance9.5

9.6Camera9.8

9.2Battery9.6

9.5Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno1617 Ultra

	Reno16	17 Ultra	Difference
Height	151.2 mm	162.9 mm	−11.7 mm
Width	72.4 mm	77.6 mm	−5.2 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	8.3 mm	−0.1 mm
Weight	188 g	218 g	−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno16 better than 17 Ultra?

Measured brightness2,124 nits vs 1,132 nits+88%
Battery capacity6,700 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+12%
Weight188 g vs 218 g+16%
Pixel density460 ppi vs 416 ppi+11%
Peak brightness3,600 nits vs 3,500 nits+3%

Why is 17 Ultra better than Reno16?

AnTuTu score1,126,077 vs 2,777,4902.5×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,006 vs 10,8962.7×
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,049 vs 6,9483.4×
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Wireless chargingNo · Reno16: Yes
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+64%
Active use (test)16.8 h vs 19.1 h+14%
Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno16≈ $1,0509.4	Xiaomi 17 Ultra≈ $1,2509.7
Design
Weight	188 g	218 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	8.3 mm
Height	151.2 mm	162.9 mm
Width	72.4 mm	77.6 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Crystal Guard	Xiaomi Shield Glass 3.0
Colours	Pop White, Twilight Violet, Dream Purple	Black, White, Starlit Green
Display
Screen size	6.3″	6.9″
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,216 px	1,200 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,608 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	416 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,600 nits	3,500 nits
Measured brightness	2,124 nits	1,132 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.5%	92.3%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4	Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.8 GHz	4.6 GHz
GPU	Adreno 722	Adreno 840
AnTuTu score	1,126,077	2,777,490
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,006	10,896
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,049	6,948
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3.5×	4.2×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,700 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	16.8 h	19.1 h
Wired charging	80 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	51%	72%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-23.8 LUFS	-24.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display, ultrasonic
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 16	HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	63 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	A	—