How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno16 vs Aquos R9 pro

OPPO Reno16 vs Sharp Aquos R9 pro

What Reno16 does better (9) and where Aquos R9 pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno16
OPPO · 2026Reno16
9.4Score
9 advantages≈ $1,050
Higher score
vs
Sharp Aquos R9 pro
Sharp · 2025Aquos R9 pro
8.8Score
9 advantages≈ $1,100
8.4Display9.3
9.6Camera9.3
9.2Battery6.4
9.5Features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno16Aquos R9 pro
72.4 × 151.28.278 × 1629.3
Reno16Aquos R9 proDifference
Height151.2 mm162 mm−10.8 mm
Width72.4 mm78 mm−5.6 mm
Thickness8.2 mm9.3 mm−1.1 mm
Weight188 g220 g−32 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno16 better than Aquos R9 pro?

  1. Wired charging80 W vs 32 W2.5×
  2. Battery capacity6,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+34%
  3. Peak brightness3,600 nits vs 2,000 nits+80%
  4. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
  5. Optical zoom3.5× vs 2.8×+25%
  6. 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R9 pro: No
  7. Weight188 g vs 220 g+17%
  8. Thickness8.2 mm vs 9.3 mm+13%
  9. Screen-to-body ratio89.5% vs 87.2%+3%

Why is Aquos R9 pro better than Reno16?

  1. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
  2. Wireless chargingNo · Reno16: Yes
  3. Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  4. Pixel density460 ppi vs 513 ppi+12%
  5. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz+7%
  6. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.7″+6%
  7. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  8. Resolution (width)1,216 px vs 1,440 px+18%
  9. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno16OPPO Reno16≈ $1,0509.4
Sharp Aquos R9 proSharp Aquos R9 pro≈ $1,1008.8
Design
Weight188 g220 g
Thickness8.2 mm9.3 mm
Height151.2 mm162 mm
Width72.4 mm78 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP68IP66
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx6
Glass protectionCrystal GuardCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursPop White, Twilight Violet, Dream PurpleBlack
Display
Screen size6.3″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDPRO IGZO LTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,216 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px3,120 px
Pixel density460 ppi513 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz240 Hz
Peak brightness3,600 nits2,000 nits
Measured brightness2,124 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.5%87.2%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 722Adreno 735
AnTuTu score1,126,077—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,006—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,049—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/0.98"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×2.8×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,700 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/C—
Active use (test)16.8 h—
Wired charging80 W32 W
Charged in 30 min51%—
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—15 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.8 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16—
Major OS updates promised—3
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle63 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare