- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno16 Pro (China) vs iQOO Neo12
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Vivo iQOO Neo12
What Reno16 Pro (China) does better (10) and where iQOO Neo12 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display9.7
9.7Camera8.8
9.6Battery9.6
9.3Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno16 Pro (China)iQOO Neo12
| Reno16 Pro (China) | iQOO Neo12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163.4 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.9 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 225 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno16 Pro (China) better than iQOO Neo12?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo12: No
- Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo12: No
- Peak brightness3,600 nits vs 2,200 nits+64%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo12: No
- Weight205 g vs 225 g+10%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.5 mm+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is iQOO Neo12 better than Reno16 Pro (China)?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 9,000 mAh+29%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 185 Hz+54%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
- CPU frequency3.73 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+23%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 514 ppi+14%
- Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,440 px+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 514 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits | 2,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 90.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.73 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC11 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,079,298 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,359 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 9,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 17 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | OriginOS 7 |
