How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno16 FS vs X200T

OPPO Reno16 FS vs Vivo X200T

What Reno16 FS does better (6) and where X200T wins (13) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno16 FS
OPPO · 2026Reno16 FS
9.1Score
6 advantages≈ $700
vs
Vivo X200T
Vivo · 2026X200T
9.6Score
13 advantages≈ $590
Higher score
8.2Display9.3
9.3Camera9.3
8.5Battery9.5
8.9Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno16 FSX200T
74.9 × 158.28.474.3 × 1608
Reno16 FSX200TDifference
Height158.2 mm160 mm−1.8 mm
Width74.9 mm74.3 mm+0.6 mm
Thickness8.4 mm8 mm+0.4 mm
Weight194 g203 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno16 FS better than X200T?

  1. Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+5%
  2. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Memory card slotYes · X200T: No
  4. Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
  5. Weight194 g vs 203 g+5%
  6. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%

Why is X200T better than Reno16 FS?

  1. Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
  2. Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 5,000 nits3.6×
  3. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  4. Wireless chargingNo · Reno16 FS: Yes
  5. Stereo speakersNo · Reno16 FS: Yes
  6. CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+45%
  7. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  8. Pixel density397 ppi vs 460 ppi+16%
  9. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  10. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
  11. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
  12. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno16 FSOPPO Reno16 FS≈ $7009.1
Vivo X200TVivo X200T≈ $5909.6
Design
Weight194 g203 g
Thickness8.4 mm8 mm
Height158.2 mm160 mm
Width74.9 mm74.3 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCrystal GuardSchott Xensation Core
ColoursPop White, Dream PurpleSeaside Lilac, Stellar Black
Display
Screen size6.6″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,372 px2,800 px
Pixel density397 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits5,000 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.6%90.4%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300 EnergyMediatek Dimensity 9400+
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.5 GHz3.63 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score—2,725,989
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—8,430
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh6,200 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Wired charging45 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—70%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—40 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video output—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—1.09 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised—5
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,800—
Endurance per cycle75 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare