android.gs
Compare
Reno16 F vs 17T Pro

OPPO Reno16 F vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

What Reno16 F does better (7) and where 17T Pro wins (23) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2026Reno16 F

9.1Score

7 advantages≈ $590

Xiaomi · 202617T Pro

9.7Score

23 advantages≈ $590

Higher score

8.2Display9.7

6.4Performance9.4

9.3Camera9.8

9.2Battery9.8

8.9Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno16 F17T Pro

	Reno16 F	17T Pro	Difference
Height	158.2 mm	162.2 mm	−4 mm
Width	74.5 mm	77.5 mm	−3 mm
Thickness	8.4 mm	8.3 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	197 g	219 g	−22 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno16 F better than 17T Pro?

Memory card slotYes · 17T Pro: No
Repairability classB vs C
Drop resistance classA vs B
Weight197 g vs 219 g+11%
Battery charge cycles1,800 vs 1,000+80%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Endurance per cycle75 h vs 71 h+6%

Why is 17T Pro better than Reno16 F?

AnTuTu score789,658 vs 2,795,0303.5×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,891 vs 9,7663.4×
Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 3,500 nits2.5×
Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
Wireless chargingNo · Reno16 F: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Reno16 F: Yes
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 4.21 GHz+68%
Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
Optical zoom3.5× vs 5×+43%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno16 F≈ $5909.1	Xiaomi 17T Pro≈ $5909.7
Design
Weight	197 g	219 g
Thickness	8.4 mm	8.3 mm
Height	158.2 mm	162.2 mm
Width	74.5 mm	77.5 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Crystal Guard	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Pop White, Twilight Violet, Dream Purple	Deep Blue, Deep Violet, Black
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,280 px
Resolution (height)	2,372 px	2,772 px
Pixel density	397 ppi	447 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	3,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,069 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.1%	91.1%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy	Mediatek Dimensity 9500
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	4.21 GHz
GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Mali-G1 Ultra MC12
AnTuTu score	789,658	2,795,030
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,891	9,766
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,939
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/2.0"	1/1.31"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3.5×	5×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,000 mAh	7,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	21.7 h
Wired charging	80 W	100 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	72%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 16	HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy class	A	A
Battery charge cycles	1,800	1,000
Endurance per cycle	75 h	71 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	A	B