How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno16 F vs X200T

OPPO Reno16 F vs Vivo X200T

What Reno16 F does better (5) and where X200T wins (17) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno16 F
OPPO · 2026Reno16 F
9.1Score
5 advantages≈ $590
vs
Vivo X200T
Vivo · 2026X200T
9.6Score
17 advantages≈ $590
Higher score
8.2Display9.3
6.4Performance9.0
9.3Camera9.3
9.2Battery9.5
8.9Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno16 FX200T
74.5 × 158.28.474.3 × 1608
Reno16 FX200TDifference
Height158.2 mm160 mm−1.8 mm
Width74.5 mm74.3 mm+0.2 mm
Thickness8.4 mm8 mm+0.4 mm
Weight197 g203 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno16 F better than X200T?

  1. Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+13%
  2. Memory card slotYes · X200T: No
  3. Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
  4. Weight197 g vs 203 g+3%
  5. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%

Why is X200T better than Reno16 F?

  1. AnTuTu score789,658 vs 2,725,9893.5×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,891 vs 8,4302.9×
  3. Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 5,000 nits3.6×
  4. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  5. Wireless chargingNo · Reno16 F: Yes
  6. Stereo speakersNo · Reno16 F: Yes
  7. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  8. CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+45%
  9. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  10. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  11. Pixel density397 ppi vs 460 ppi+16%
  12. Charged in 30 min50% vs 70%+40%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno16 FOPPO Reno16 F≈ $5909.1
Vivo X200TVivo X200T≈ $5909.6
Design
Weight197 g203 g
Thickness8.4 mm8 mm
Height158.2 mm160 mm
Width74.5 mm74.3 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCrystal GuardSchott Xensation Core
ColoursPop White, Twilight Violet, Dream PurpleSeaside Lilac, Stellar Black
Display
Screen size6.6″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,372 px2,800 px
Pixel density397 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits5,000 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.1%90.4%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300 EnergyMediatek Dimensity 9400+
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.5 GHz3.63 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score789,6582,725,989
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,8918,430
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,000 mAh6,200 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min50%70%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—40 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video output—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—1.09 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised—5
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,800—
Endurance per cycle75 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare