How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno15 vs X300 FE (Russia)

OPPO Reno15 vs Vivo X300 FE (Russia)

What Reno15 does better (4) and where X300 FE (Russia) wins (9) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno15
OPPO · 2026Reno15
9.1Score
4 advantages≈ $700
vs
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
Vivo · 2026X300 FE (Russia)
9.4Score
9 advantages≈ $700
Higher score
8.1Display8.3
9.6Camera9.4
9.0Battery9.5
9.2Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno15X300 FE (Russia)
74.8 × 1587.871.8 × 150.88
Reno15X300 FE (Russia)Difference
Height158 mm150.8 mm+7.2 mm
Width74.8 mm71.8 mm+3 mm
Thickness7.8 mm8 mm−0.2 mm
Weight197 g191 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno15 better than X300 FE (Russia)?

  1. Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
  2. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.3″+4%
  3. Resolution (width)1,256 px vs 1,216 px+3%
  4. Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%

Why is X300 FE (Russia) better than Reno15?

  1. Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 5,000 nits4.2×
  2. Wireless chargingNo · Reno15: Yes
  3. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  4. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+36%
  5. Weight197 g vs 191 g+3%
  6. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
  7. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
  9. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno15OPPO Reno15≈ $7009.1
Design
Weight197 g191 g
Thickness7.8 mm8 mm
Height158 mm150.8 mm
Width74.8 mm71.8 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i—
ColoursAurora Blue, Twilight Blue, Aurora WhiteMoonlight White, Cool Purple, Graphite Black
Display
Screen size6.6″6.3″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,256 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)2,760 px2,640 px
Pixel density460 ppi461 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits5,000 nits
Measured brightness1,188 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.4%90.2%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
GPUAdreno 722Adreno 829
AnTuTu score1,086,657—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,188—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,049—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)16.4 h—
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min60%—
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—40 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.3 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised—5
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle71 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare