How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno15 vs X200T

OPPO Reno15 vs Vivo X200T

What Reno15 does better (5) and where X200T wins (10) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno15
OPPO · 2026Reno15
9.1Score
5 advantages≈ $700
vs
Vivo X200T
Vivo · 2026X200T
9.6Score
10 advantages≈ $590
Higher score
8.1Display9.3
6.0Performance9.0
9.6Camera9.3
9.0Battery9.5
9.2Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno15X200T
74.8 × 1587.874.3 × 1608
Reno15X200TDifference
Height158 mm160 mm−2 mm
Width74.8 mm74.3 mm+0.5 mm
Thickness7.8 mm8 mm−0.2 mm
Weight197 g203 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno15 better than X200T?

  1. Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+5%
  2. Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
  3. Weight197 g vs 203 g+3%
  4. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  5. Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%

Why is X200T better than Reno15?

  1. AnTuTu score1,086,657 vs 2,725,9892.5×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,188 vs 8,4307.1×
  3. Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 5,000 nits4.2×
  4. Wireless chargingNo · Reno15: Yes
  5. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  6. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+30%
  7. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
  8. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  9. Charged in 30 min60% vs 70%+17%
  10. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno15OPPO Reno15≈ $7009.1
Vivo X200TVivo X200T≈ $5909.6
Design
Weight197 g203 g
Thickness7.8 mm8 mm
Height158 mm160 mm
Width74.8 mm74.3 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iSchott Xensation Core
ColoursAurora Blue, Twilight Blue, Aurora WhiteSeaside Lilac, Stellar Black
Display
Screen size6.6″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,256 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,760 px2,800 px
Pixel density460 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits5,000 nits
Measured brightness1,188 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.4%90.4%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz3.63 GHz
GPUAdreno 722Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score1,086,6572,725,989
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,1888,430
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,049—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh6,200 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)16.4 h—
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min60%70%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—40 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.3 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—1.09 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised—5
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle71 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare