How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno15 vs iQOO 15R

OPPO Reno15 vs Vivo iQOO 15R

What Reno15 does better (6) and where iQOO 15R wins (10) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno15
OPPO · 2026Reno15
9.1Score
6 advantages≈ $700
vs
Vivo iQOO 15R
Vivo · 2026iQOO 15R
9.5Score
10 advantages≈ $720
Higher score
8.1Display9.5
6.0Performance9.1
9.6Camera8.9
9.0Battery9.6
9.2Features9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno15iQOO 15R
74.8 × 1587.874.4 × 157.67.9
Reno15iQOO 15RDifference
Height158 mm157.6 mm+0.4 mm
Width74.8 mm74.4 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness7.8 mm7.9 mm−0.1 mm
Weight197 g202 g−5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno15 better than iQOO 15R?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO 15R: No
  2. eSIMYes · iQOO 15R: No
  3. Weight197 g vs 202 g+3%
  4. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  5. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  6. Charged in 30 min60% vs 53%+13%

Why is iQOO 15R better than Reno15?

  1. AnTuTu score1,086,657 vs 3,047,7412.8×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,188 vs 8,9237.5×
  3. Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 5,000 nits4.2×
  4. Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 7,600 mAh+17%
  5. Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
  6. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  7. CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+36%
  8. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
  9. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  10. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno15OPPO Reno15≈ $7009.1
Vivo iQOO 15RVivo iQOO 15R≈ $7209.5
Design
Weight197 g202 g
Thickness7.8 mm7.9 mm
Height158 mm157.6 mm
Width74.8 mm74.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i—
ColoursAurora Blue, Twilight Blue, Aurora WhiteDark Knight, Triumph Silver
Display
Screen size6.6″6.6″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,256 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,760 px2,750 px
Pixel density460 ppi459 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits5,000 nits
Measured brightness1,188 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.4%90.5%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
GPUAdreno 722Adreno 829
AnTuTu score1,086,6573,047,741
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,1888,923
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,049—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.56"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3.5×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh7,600 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)16.4 h—
Wired charging80 W100 W
Charged in 30 min60%53%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.3 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle71 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare