- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno15 Pro Max vs X300 E
OPPO Reno15 Pro Max vs Vivo X300 E
What Reno15 Pro Max does better (7) and where X300 E wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display9.5
8.5Performance9.1
9.7Camera9.4
9.6Battery9.2
9.5Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno15 Pro MaxX300 E
| Reno15 Pro Max | X300 E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 157.5 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 74.3 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 200 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno15 Pro Max better than X300 E?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Wireless chargingYes · X300 E: No
- eSIMYes · X300 E: No
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Wireless charging power50 W vs 40 W+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is X300 E better than Reno15 Pro Max?
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 5,000 nits2.8×
- AnTuTu score2,131,620 vs 2,886,527+35%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,321 vs 9,056+43%
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 7,200 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+17%
- Weight205 g vs 200 g+2%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 157.5 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Dusk Brown, Aura Gold | White, Gray, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,750 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 459 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 90.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 | Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.25 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 829 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,131,620 | 2,886,527 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,321 | 9,056 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 7,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 59% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 40 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
