- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno15 Pro Max vs iQOO Z11 (China)
OPPO Reno15 Pro Max vs Vivo iQOO Z11 (China)
What Reno15 Pro Max does better (10) and where iQOO Z11 (China) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display9.8
9.7Camera7.9
9.6Battery9.6
9.5Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno15 Pro MaxiQOO Z11 (China)
| Reno15 Pro Max | iQOO Z11 (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163.7 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.1 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 216 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno15 Pro Max better than iQOO Z11 (China)?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Z11 (China): No
- Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Z11 (China): No
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Z11 (China): No
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Z11 (China): No
- eSIMYes · iQOO Z11 (China): No
- Weight205 g vs 216 g+6%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.3 mm+8%
Why is iQOO Z11 (China) better than Reno15 Pro Max?
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 5,000 nits2.8×
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 9,020 mAh+39%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 216 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Dusk Brown, Aura Gold | Black, White, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 | Mediatek Dimensity 8500 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.25 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Mali-G720 MC8 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,131,620 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,321 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 9,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 59% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
