How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno15 FS vs X300 FE

OPPO Reno15 FS vs Vivo X300 FE

What Reno15 FS does better (6) and where X300 FE wins (15) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno15 FS
OPPO · 2026Reno15 FS
9.1Score
6 advantages≈ $920
vs
Vivo X300 FE
Vivo · 2026X300 FE
9.6Score
15 advantages≈ $920
Higher score
8.2Display8.3
8.5Camera9.6
9.1Battery9.6
9.2Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno15 FSX300 FE
74.9 × 158.28.271.8 × 150.88.2
Reno15 FSX300 FEDifference
Height158.2 mm150.8 mm+7.4 mm
Width74.9 mm71.8 mm+3.1 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.2 mm=
Weight189 g190 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno15 FS better than X300 FE?

  1. Memory card slotYes · X300 FE: No
  2. Energy classA vs B
  3. Repairability classB vs C
  4. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.3″+4%
  5. Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 1,200+33%
  6. Endurance per cycle68 h vs 59 h+15%

Why is X300 FE better than Reno15 FS?

  1. Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 5,000 nits3.6×
  2. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  3. Telephoto cameraNo · Reno15 FS: Yes
  4. Wireless chargingNo · Reno15 FS: Yes
  5. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+73%
  6. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  7. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
  8. Max video4K vs 8K
  9. Pixel density397 ppi vs 461 ppi+16%
  10. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  11. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
  12. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno15 FSOPPO Reno15 FS≈ $9209.1
Vivo X300 FEVivo X300 FE≈ $9209.6
Design
Weight189 g190 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.2 mm
Height158.2 mm150.8 mm
Width74.9 mm71.8 mm
Frame—Aluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass+—
ColoursBlue, Navy BlueMisty Purple (Lilac Purple), Radiant White, Cool Black (Noir Black), Green, Urban Olive
Display
Screen size6.6″6.3″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)2,372 px2,640 px
Pixel density397 ppi461 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits5,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,774 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.6%90.2%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz3.8 GHz
GPUAdreno 710Adreno 829
AnTuTu score—2,234,101
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—9,356
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,189
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps120 fps
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—18.8 h
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—55%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—40 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised—5
EU label
Energy classAB
Battery charge cycles1,6001,200
Endurance per cycle68 h59 h
Repairability classBC
Drop resistance classCC
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare