- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno15 F vs RugOne Xever 8
OPPO Reno15 F vs UleFone RugOne Xever 8
What Reno15 F does better (11) and where RugOne Xever 8 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display4.2
9.1Camera6.8
9.2Battery3.2
8.4Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno15 FRugOne Xever 8
| Reno15 F | RugOne Xever 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.2 mm | 168 mm | −9.8 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 80 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 14 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 320 g | −125 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno15 F better than RugOne Xever 8?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+49%
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 680 nits2.1×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- 5GYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Weight195 g vs 320 g+64%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 14 mm+73%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Why is RugOne Xever 8 better than Reno15 F?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 320 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 158.2 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 80 mm |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass+ | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Afterglow Pink, Twilight Blue, Aurora Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 680 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | — |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 865,334 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,579 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 68 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
