- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno15 F 5G vs Redmi M100 Pro
OPPO Reno15 F 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro
What Reno15 F 5G does better (6) and where Redmi M100 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display8.8
8.5Camera8.2
9.1Battery8.0
8.2Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno15 F 5GRedmi M100 Pro
| Reno15 F 5G | Redmi M100 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.1 mm | 162.3 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno15 F 5G better than Redmi M100 Pro?
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+18%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi M100 Pro: No
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio92.8% vs 88.9%+4%
Why is Redmi M100 Pro better than Reno15 F 5G?
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 3,000 nits2.1×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Pixel density397 ppi vs 446 ppi+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,220 px+13%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 158.1 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | — | Titan Black, Phantom Purple, Spectre Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.8% | 88.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 907,685 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,931 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | — | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.96" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint, thermometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HyperOS 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 67 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
