- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno15 F 5G vs Pilot 8
OPPO Reno15 F 5G vs OSCAL Pilot 8
What Reno15 F 5G does better (10) and where Pilot 8 wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display8.1
8.5Camera7.8
9.1Battery9.1
8.2Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno15 F 5GPilot 8
| Reno15 F 5G | Pilot 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.1 mm | 178.7 mm | −20.6 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 85.4 mm | −11.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 17.9 mm | −9.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno15 F 5G better than Pilot 8?
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 600 nits2.3×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pilot 8: No
- Wired charging80 W vs 55 W+45%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 17.9 mm2.2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pilot 8: No
- Energy classA vs B
- Battery charge cycles1,600 vs 8002×
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio92.8% vs 75.1%+24%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Pilot 8 better than Reno15 F 5G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 10,200 mAh+57%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz+32%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- eSIMNo · Reno15 F 5G: Yes
- Drop resistance classC vs A
- Pixel density397 ppi vs 447 ppi+13%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+4%
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
- Endurance per cycle67 h vs 96 h+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 389 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 17.9 mm |
| Height | 158.1 mm | 178.7 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 85.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass | CSG KK9 Glass |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.8% | 75.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Dragonwing Q-6690 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 55 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint, thermometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.97 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | DokeOS 5.0 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 67 h | 96 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | C | A |
