- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno15 5G vs Poco X8 Power
OPPO Reno15 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Power
What Reno15 5G does better (13) and where Poco X8 Power wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display9.4
9.4Camera8.4
9.1Battery9.6
9.8Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno15 5GPoco X8 Power
| Reno15 5G | Poco X8 Power | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158 mm | 163.4 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 78.3 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 229 g | −32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno15 5G better than Poco X8 Power?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Poco X8 Power: No
- NFCYes · Poco X8 Power: No
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Weight197 g vs 229 g+16%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+8%
- Pixel density460 ppi vs 447 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.6 mm+9%
Why is Poco X8 Power better than Reno15 5G?
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+54%
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 3,500 nits2.9×
- Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 229 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 158 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 78.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | — | Black, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,256 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,760 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 3,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 93.4% | 89.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Qualcomm SM6850 Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 812 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,010,104 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,469 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | — | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | — |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 57% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
