- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno15 5G vs Camon Slim 4G
OPPO Reno15 5G vs Tecno Camon Slim 4G
What Reno15 5G does better (19) and where Camon Slim 4G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display9.7
9.4Camera5.9
9.1Battery8.2
9.8Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno15 5GCamon Slim 4G
| Reno15 5G | Camon Slim 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158 mm | 162.8 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 77.7 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 6.4 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 168 g | +29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno15 5G better than Camon Slim 4G?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Camon Slim 4G: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Camon Slim 4G: No
- 5GYes · Camon Slim 4G: No
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,600 mAh+16%
- Wired charging80 W vs 60 W+33%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+27%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon Slim 4G: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon Slim 4G: No
- eSIMYes · Camon Slim 4G: No
Why is Camon Slim 4G better than Reno15 5G?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Weight197 g vs 168 g+17%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 6.4 mm+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 168 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 6.4 mm |
| Height | 158 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 77.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | — | New Mondrian, Prism Black, Jungle Green, Van Gogh Blue, Burgundy Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,256 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,760 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 93.4% | 87.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 576,430 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,838 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | — |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 60 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | HIOS 16.2 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
