- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno14 FS 5G vs Pova 7 Ultra
OPPO Reno14 FS 5G vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
What Reno14 FS 5G does better (9) and where Pova 7 Ultra wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display9.6
8.4Camera7.8
8.2Battery9.1
7.4Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno14 FS 5GPova 7 Ultra
| Reno14 FS 5G | Pova 7 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.1 mm | 160 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 201 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno14 FS 5G better than Pova 7 Ultra?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx42.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 7 Ultra: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Memory card slotYes · Pova 7 Ultra: No
- Weight180 g vs 201 g+12%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.9 mm+16%
Why is Pova 7 Ultra better than Reno14 FS 5G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 4,500 nits3.2×
- Wired charging45 W vs 70 W+56%
- Wireless chargingNo · Reno14 FS 5G: Yes
- NFCNo · Reno14 FS 5G: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+52%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Reno14 FS 5G: Yes
- Pixel density397 ppi vs 460 ppi+16%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 158.1 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | AGC Dragontrail DT-Star D+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Opal Blue, Luminous Green | Geek White, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,372 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 89.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,771,444 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,914 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
