How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno14 F 5G vs Galaxy S25 Edge

OPPO Reno14 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

What Reno14 F 5G does better (6) and where Galaxy S25 Edge wins (24) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno14 F 5G
OPPO · 2025Reno14 F 5G
8.5Score
6 advantages≈ $420
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 Edge
8.8Score
24 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
8.2Display8.7
5.6Performance8.9
8.3Camera8.2
8.2Battery3.0
7.7Features9.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno14 F 5GGalaxy S25 Edge
75 × 158.17.775.6 × 158.25.8
Reno14 F 5GGalaxy S25 EdgeDifference
Height158.1 mm158.2 mm−0.1 mm
Width75 mm75.6 mm−0.6 mm
Thickness7.7 mm5.8 mm+1.9 mm
Weight180 g163 g+17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno14 F 5G better than Galaxy S25 Edge?

  1. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 3,900 mAh+54%
  2. Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
  3. Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
  4. Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 Edge: No
  5. Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
  6. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is Galaxy S25 Edge better than Reno14 F 5G?

  1. AnTuTu score776,077 vs 2,147,0842.8×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,671 vs 9,3913.5×
  3. Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
  4. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  5. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 4.47 GHz2×
  6. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  7. Wireless chargingNo · Reno14 F 5G: Yes
  8. NFCNo · Reno14 F 5G: Yes
  9. Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 2,600 nits+86%
  10. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
  11. Pixel density397 ppi vs 513 ppi+29%
  12. Max video4K vs 8K
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno14 F 5GOPPO Reno14 F 5G≈ $4208.5
Design
Weight180 g163 g
Thickness7.7 mm5.8 mm
Height158.1 mm158.2 mm
Width75 mm75.6 mm
FramePlasticTitanium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIP69IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx9IPx8
Glass protectionAGC Dragontrail DT-Star D+Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2
ColoursBlue, Green, PinkTitanium Icyblue, Titanium Silver, Titanium Jetblack
Display
Screen size6.6″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,372 px3,120 px
Pixel density397 ppi513 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits2,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,416 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.6%92.1%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz4.47 GHz
GPUAdreno 710Adreno 830
AnTuTu score776,0772,147,084
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,6719,391
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,473
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.3"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Optical zoom—2×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP12 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh3,900 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Active use (test)—12.1 h
Wired charging45 W25 W
Charged in 30 min43%55%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—15 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15.4
NFCNoYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Satellite navigationGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
Barometer—Yes
Sensorsproximity, accelerometer, gyro, fingerprintFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—1.24 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15One UI 9
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy classAA
Battery charge cycles—2,000
Endurance per cycle—40 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare