- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno14 5G vs Camon 40 Premier
OPPO Reno14 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier
What Reno14 5G does better (7) and where Camon 40 Premier wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display9.0
9.6Camera9.4
8.2Battery6.3
7.4Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno14 5GCamon 40 Premier
| Reno14 5G | Camon 40 Premier | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157.9 mm | 161 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 75 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.7 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 193 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno14 5G better than Camon 40 Premier?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+18%
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
- Weight187 g vs 193 g+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 7.7 mm+5%
Why is Camon 40 Premier better than Reno14 5G?
- Wired charging45 W vs 70 W+56%
- NFCNo · Reno14 5G: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 1,600 nits+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 157.9 mm | 161 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | — | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,256 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,760 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 658 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 89% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.35 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G615 MC6 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,418,376 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,224 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,911 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4. |
| Memory card slot | — | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
