How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno13 vs Axon 60 Ultra

OPPO Reno13 vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

What Reno13 does better (5) and where Axon 60 Ultra wins (5) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno13
OPPO · 2024Reno13
9.3Score
5 advantages≈ $700
Higher score
vs
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
ZTE · 2024Axon 60 Ultra
9.2Score
5 advantages≈ $840
8.1Display9.5
9.1Camera8.8
8.8Battery8.9
9.5Features9.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno13Axon 60 Ultra
74.7 × 157.97.276 × 163.69.1
Reno13Axon 60 UltraDifference
Height157.9 mm163.6 mm−5.7 mm
Width74.7 mm76 mm−1.3 mm
Thickness7.2 mm9.1 mm−1.9 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno13 better than Axon 60 Ultra?

  1. 4K selfie videoYes · Axon 60 Ultra: No
  2. eSIMYes · Axon 60 Ultra: No
  3. CPU frequency3.35 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+5%
  4. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  5. Thickness7.2 mm vs 9.1 mm+26%

Why is Axon 60 Ultra better than Reno13?

  1. Battery capacity5,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+7%
  2. Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
  3. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
  4. USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
  5. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno13OPPO Reno13≈ $7009.3
Design
Weight181 g—
Thickness7.2 mm9.1 mm
Height157.9 mm163.6 mm
Width74.7 mm76 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i—
ColoursPlume White, Luminous Blue, Black, Purple, BlueObsidian Black
Display
Screen size6.6″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,256 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,760 px2,800 px
Pixel density460 ppi453 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits—
Measured brightness1,204 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.6%89.3%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8350Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.35 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUMali G615-MC6Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,378,614—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,208—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,868—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)128 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8—
Main sensor size1/1.95"—
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K—
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,600 mAh6,000 mAh
Active use (test)16.8 h—
Wired charging80 W80 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.1
USB version23.1
Satellite messaging—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.7 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle64 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare