- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno13 F 5G vs Galaxy M47
OPPO Reno13 F 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M47
What Reno13 F 5G does better (10) and where Galaxy M47 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display8.0
8.3Camera7.9
8.1Battery8.2
7.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno13 F 5GGalaxy M47
| Reno13 F 5G | Galaxy M47 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.2 mm | 162.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 78.2 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 206 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno13 F 5G better than Galaxy M47?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx42.2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy M47: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Galaxy M47: No
- Weight192 g vs 206 g+7%
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 385 ppi+2%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio92.2% vs 86.8%+6%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.1 mm+4%
Why is Galaxy M47 better than Reno13 F 5G?
- NFCNo · Reno13 F 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 162.2 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 78.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Purple | Blaze Blue, Rogue Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.2% | 86.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 862,042 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,643 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.5 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
