- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno13 F 5G vs WP200 Pro
OPPO Reno13 F 5G vs Oukitel WP200 Pro
What Reno13 F 5G does better (11) and where WP200 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display7.3
8.3Camera7.0
8.1Battery9.0
7.7Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno13 F 5GWP200 Pro
| Reno13 F 5G | WP200 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.2 mm | 163.6 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77.9 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 13.7 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 311 g | −119 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno13 F 5G better than WP200 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 500 nits2.4×
- Optical stabilisationYes · WP200 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · WP200 Pro: No
- Weight192 g vs 311 g+62%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · WP200 Pro: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · WP200 Pro: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 13.7 mm+76%
- Screen-to-body ratio92.2% vs 84.8%+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is WP200 Pro better than Reno13 F 5G?
- RAM8 GB vs 24 GB3×
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 8,800 mAh+52%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- NFCNo · Reno13 F 5G: Yes
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 311 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 162.2 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Purple | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.2% | 84.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 862,042 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,643 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.8" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 8,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 86 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
