android.gs
Compare
Reno13 F 4G vs Galaxy S25+

OPPO Reno13 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy S25+

What Reno13 F 4G does better (3) and where Galaxy S25+ wins (18) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025Reno13 F 4G

8.6Score

3 advantages

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25+

9.2Score

18 advantages≈ $560

Higher score

8.6Display8.7

8.2Camera9.2

8.1Battery6.4

6.7Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno13 F 4GGalaxy S25+

	Reno13 F 4G	Galaxy S25+	Difference
Height	162.2 mm	158.4 mm	+3.8 mm
Width	75.1 mm	75.8 mm	−0.7 mm
Thickness	7.8 mm	7.3 mm	+0.5 mm
Weight	192 g	190 g	+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno13 F 4G better than Galaxy S25+?

Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+18%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25+: No

Why is Galaxy S25+ better than Reno13 F 4G?

RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 4.47 GHz2×
Telephoto cameraNo · Reno13 F 4G: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Reno13 F 4G: Yes
5GNo · Reno13 F 4G: Yes
Pixel density395 ppi vs 513 ppi+30%
Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 2,600 nits+24%
Process6 nm vs 3 nm2×
Max video1080p vs 8K
4K selfie videoNo · Reno13 F 4G: Yes
eSIMNo · Reno13 F 4G: Yes
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno13 F 4G8.6	Samsung Galaxy S25+≈ $5609.2
Design
Weight	192 g	190 g
Thickness	7.8 mm	7.3 mm
Height	162.2 mm	158.4 mm
Width	75.1 mm	75.8 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Colours	Graphite Grey, Skyline Blue, Plume Purple	Icy Blue, Mint, Navy, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold, Coral Red, Blue Black
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	3,120 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	513 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	2,100 nits	2,600 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,449 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.2%	91.8%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G100	Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	6 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	4.47 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	—	2,133,477
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	9,669
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,601
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	1080p	8K
4K video frame rate	—	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,800 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	14.4 h
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	45%	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Ultra Wideband	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display, ultrasonic
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	1.26 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	44 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A