android.gs
Compare
Reno13 F 4G vs Galaxy S25 FE

OPPO Reno13 F 4G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What Reno13 F 4G does better (6) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (14) — every spec side by side.

OPPO · 2025Reno13 F 4G

8.6Score

6 advantages

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

14 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

8.6Display8.1

8.2Camera9.3

8.1Battery4.8

6.7Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno13 F 4GGalaxy S25 FE

	Reno13 F 4G	Galaxy S25 FE	Difference
Height	162.2 mm	161.3 mm	+0.9 mm
Width	75.1 mm	76.6 mm	−1.5 mm
Thickness	7.8 mm	7.4 mm	+0.4 mm
Weight	192 g	190 g	+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno13 F 4G better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+18%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 FE: No
Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 1,900 nits+11%
Pixel density395 ppi vs 385 ppi+3%

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than Reno13 F 4G?

Telephoto cameraNo · Reno13 F 4G: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Reno13 F 4G: Yes
5GNo · Reno13 F 4G: Yes
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+45%
Max video1080p vs 8K
4K selfie videoNo · Reno13 F 4G: Yes
eSIMNo · Reno13 F 4G: Yes
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Charged in 30 min45% vs 65%+44%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	OPPO Reno13 F 4G8.6	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9
Design
Weight	192 g	190 g
Thickness	7.8 mm	7.4 mm
Height	162.2 mm	161.3 mm
Width	75.1 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Graphite Grey, Skyline Blue, Plume Purple	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	2,100 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.2%	89.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G100	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,262
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	1080p	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,800 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	45%	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	ColorOS 15	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	43 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A