How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno12 Pro (China) vs Poco F6

OPPO Reno12 Pro (China) vs Xiaomi Poco F6

What Reno12 Pro (China) does better (8) and where Poco F6 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno12 Pro (China)
OPPO · 2024Reno12 Pro (China)
8.5Score
8 advantages≈ $480
vs
Xiaomi Poco F6
Xiaomi · 2024Poco F6
8.6Score
7 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
7.8Display8.8
8.9Camera8.8
7.4Battery4.9
7.3Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno12 Pro (China)Poco F6
74.8 × 161.47.674.5 × 160.58
Reno12 Pro (China)Poco F6Difference
Height161.4 mm160.5 mm+0.9 mm
Width74.8 mm74.5 mm+0.3 mm
Thickness7.6 mm8 mm−0.4 mm
Weight183 g179 g+4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno12 Pro (China) better than Poco F6?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F6: No
  2. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  3. Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
  4. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
  5. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F6: No
  6. CPU frequency3.35 GHz vs 3 GHz+12%
  7. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  8. Thickness7.6 mm vs 8 mm+5%

Why is Poco F6 better than Reno12 Pro (China)?

  1. Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 2,400 nits2×
  2. Stereo speakersNo · Reno12 Pro (China): Yes
  3. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  4. Pixel density394 ppi vs 446 ppi+13%
  5. Weight183 g vs 179 g+2%
  6. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,220 px+13%
  7. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco F6Xiaomi Poco F6≈ $4108.6
Design
Weight183 g179 g
Thickness7.6 mm8 mm
Height161.4 mm160.5 mm
Width74.8 mm74.5 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP65IP64
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version)Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursBlack, Purple, Rose GoldBlack, Green, Titanium
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,220 px
Resolution (height)2,412 px2,712 px
Pixel density394 ppi446 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits2,400 nits
Measured brightness—1,218 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.5%89.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9200+Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.35 GHz3 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G715 MC11Adreno 735
AnTuTu score—1,497,886
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—4,883
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—3,110
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom2×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—10.6 h
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—86%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 14.1HyperOS
Major OS updates promised—3
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare