- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno12 Pro 5G vs iQOO Z9s Pro
OPPO Reno12 Pro 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro
What Reno12 Pro 5G does better (11) and where iQOO Z9s Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display8.7
6.8Performance7.1
8.4Camera8.2
7.4Battery8.5
8.0Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno12 Pro 5GiQOO Z9s Pro
| Reno12 Pro 5G | iQOO Z9s Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 163.7 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 181 g | 185 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno12 Pro 5G better than iQOO Z9s Pro?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Z9s Pro: No
- NFCYes · iQOO Z9s Pro: No
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Z9s Pro: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Z9s Pro: No
- Weight181 g vs 185 g+2%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio93.5% vs 90.3%+4%
Why is iQOO Z9s Pro better than Reno12 Pro 5G?
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 4,500 nits3.8×
- AnTuTu score914,820 vs 1,015,447+11%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- Dual SIMNo · Reno12 Pro 5G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.63 GHz+5%
- Charged in 30 min65% vs 71%+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Schott Xensation |
| Colours | Brown | Flamboyant Orange, Luxe Marble |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 961 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 93.5% | 90.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.63 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G15 | Adreno 720 |
| AnTuTu score | 914,820 | 1,015,447 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,999 | 3,036 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 71% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
