- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno12 (China) vs Redmi K80
OPPO Reno12 (China) vs Xiaomi Redmi K80
What Reno12 (China) does better (6) and where Redmi K80 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display9.1
8.9Camera9.0
7.4Battery9.3
7.3Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno12 (China)Redmi K80
| Reno12 (China) | Redmi K80 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.4 mm | 160.3 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 206 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno12 (China) better than Redmi K80?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi K80: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi K80: No
- Weight179 g vs 206 g+15%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 8.1 mm+11%
Why is Redmi K80 better than Reno12 (China)?
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 3,200 nits2.7×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,550 mAh+31%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Reno12 (China): Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 526 ppi+34%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+6%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 161.4 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Silver, peach | Black, White, Mint, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8250 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,277,927 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,524 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,262 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,550 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14.1 | HyperOS 2 |
