- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno11 vs T3 Ultra
OPPO Reno11 vs Vivo T3 Ultra
What Reno11 does better (8) and where T3 Ultra wins (13) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno11T3 Ultra
| Reno11 | T3 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 164.2 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 74.9 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 182 g | 192 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno11 better than T3 Ultra?
- Telephoto cameraYes · T3 Ultra: No
- NFCYes · T3 Ultra: No
- Memory card slotYes · T3 Ultra: No
- Weight182 g vs 192 g+5%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Charged in 30 min67% vs 54%+24%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is T3 Ultra better than Reno11?
- AnTuTu score783,002 vs 1,870,1852.4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,560 vs 5,4712.1×
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 4,500 nits4.7×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- Wired charging67 W vs 80 W+19%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+29%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IPX4 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Wave Green, Rock Grey | Lunar Gray, Frost Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | 783,002 | 1,870,185 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,560 | 5,471 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 67% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.97 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | Funtouch 14 |
