- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno11 Pro (China) vs V27 Pro
OPPO Reno11 Pro (China) vs Vivo V27 Pro
What Reno11 Pro (China) does better (12) and where V27 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display7.4
8.8Camera9.1
6.4Battery5.7
7.9Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno11 Pro (China)V27 Pro
| Reno11 Pro (China) | V27 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 164.1 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 182 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno11 Pro (China) better than V27 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 600 nits2.7×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · V27 Pro: No
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+2%
- Wired charging80 W vs 66 W+21%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density451 ppi vs 388 ppi+16%
- Charged in 30 min136% vs 79%+72%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+3%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Resolution (width)1,240 px vs 1,080 px+15%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is V27 Pro better than Reno11 Pro (China)?
- Weight190 g vs 182 g+4%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.4 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 182 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Green, Silver | Magic Blue, Noble Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,240 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 451 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 978 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 846,767 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,933 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,788 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 136% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.22 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | Funtouch 13 |
