- android.gs
- Compare
- Reno11 Pro (China) vs Power Armor 18 Ultra
OPPO Reno11 Pro (China) vs UleFone Power Armor 18 Ultra
What Reno11 Pro (China) does better (18) and where Power Armor 18 Ultra wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display6.7
8.8Camera7.6
6.4Battery9.2
7.9Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno11 Pro (China)Power Armor 18 Ultra
| Reno11 Pro (China) | Power Armor 18 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 175.2 mm | −12.2 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 83.4 mm | −9.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 18.8 mm | −10.6 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 409 g | −219 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno11 Pro (China) better than Power Armor 18 Ultra?
- Weight190 g vs 409 g2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Power Armor 18 Ultra: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Power Armor 18 Ultra: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Power Armor 18 Ultra: No
- Wired charging80 W vs 66 W+21%
- Charged in 30 min136% vs 52%2.6×
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 18.8 mm2.3×
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+23%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Power Armor 18 Ultra: No
- Pixel density451 ppi vs 401 ppi+12%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
Why is Power Armor 18 Ultra better than Reno11 Pro (China)?
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 9,600 mAh2×
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Wireless chargingNo · Reno11 Pro (China): Yes
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Reno11 Pro (China): Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno11 Pro (China): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 409 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 18.8 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 175.2 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 83.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Green, Silver | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,240 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 451 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 71.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 9,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 136% | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 14 | — |
